The challenge has intensified: why did a three-day journey to the Moon turn into a months-long expedition?

It has been over half a century since humans first set foot on the Moon, yet modern spacecraft often take longer to reach it than the Apollo missions did. This is due to advancements in spaceflight technology, where engineers have developed methods to save fuel by utilizing gravitational fields, writes IFLScience.

The Moon, located at an average distance of about 384,400 kilometers from Earth, does not have a fixed orbit, whose characteristics affect the visible size of Earth's satellite in the night sky. The distance itself varies along an elliptical trajectory, ranging from 363,300 kilometers at its closest point (perigee) to 405,500 kilometers at its farthest (apogee). These fluctuations impact travel time, making the duration of missions dependent on the launch timing and selected route.

During the Apollo program, crews typically reached the Moon in about three days. "Apollo 8" completed its journey in just over 69 hours, while "Apollo 11" took 75 hours and 50 minutes to land. These missions followed a "direct" trajectory, leveraging the gravitational pull of the Earth and the Moon, but required significant fuel expenditure. In contrast, modern interplanetary missions prioritize efficiency over speed, particularly through gravity-assist maneuvers to reduce fuel needs.

An example of this technology is the launch of the European Space Agency's SMART-1 satellite in 2003, which took 13 months to reach the Moon via a spiral trajectory around the Earth. While such lengthy journeys are impractical for human missions, they showcase fuel-efficient strategies for space exploration. Meanwhile, uncrewed probes can operate under different constraints. For instance, NASA's "New Horizons" flew past the Moon in just nine hours in 2006 on its way to Pluto.

The fastest flight to the Moon was achieved by the Soviet spacecraft "Luna-1," which covered the lunar distance in 34 hours in 1959. However, due to a miscalculation, it did not reach the Moon and was sent into deep space. In comparison, NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter took about seven months to travel to Mars, illustrating the greater complexity of interplanetary travel.

As the Moon slowly drifts away from Earth at a rate of 2.5 centimeters per year, future missions may require even more time to reach it than they do today.

We also reported on a mysterious circle discovered in Denmark. Despite its distance from Stonehenge, it is strikingly similar.